5G: Does the EU Represent Corporate Interest.. or the People's?

Firstly.. What is the difference between 4G and 5G?

Let's look at the frequencies: 4G networks use frequencies below 6 GHz, but 5G uses extremely high frequencies in the 30 GHz to 300 GHz range. 
That is a MASSIVE JUMP! 
Humans are beings of energy, frequency and vibration. We have electrical current running around each cell, which Omnia refers to as 'light rings' - we are publishing a Science journal which explains this concept soon because it is critical to understanding the reason radiation of this level harms us.

Mobile phone signals disrupt the vibration of our cells and it is most likely that over time this will lead to disease. How do we know this? From the 6,000 peer-reviewed health studies which already show a wide range of serious diseases caused specifically by 4G frequencies.

So what will happen when we ramp these frequencies up? You don't need a high IQ to work this out: more people will get sick and it will happen quicker. 
The 5G rollout is now being fought by independent scientists and movements like the National Toxicology Programme. 230 scientists have have officially teamed up and presented a case to the EU courts that there are grounds for concern (6,000 grounds for concern!) and that if nothing else, the precautionary principle should be exerted. 

Will the EU courts listen? Or will they just bow to the corporate 5G juggernaut?

Omnia believes this is something we all need to be educated about and that we all need to take action against too. We advocate following and supporting The 5G Appeal - the link is at the bottom of this article. To remind you, 5G is going ahead without any biological testing. That means zero testing on human beings. Compare that with the military findings that the frequencies being used are in a range that was found to have potential for use against human beings as, for example, a means of crowd control. 

 

To underline the sheer insanity of this situation, Omnia has provided clear visual proof that there is disruption to the balance of the body when it is exposed to 4G frequencies, which you can see in the video at the bottom of this article.  

So when you increase the frequencies by 50 times, as you do with 5G, the results you see on the Omnia live blood analysis are going to be even more severe. 

However, the strangest part is that we live in a world where Health and Safety has gone to such draconian levels in every other industry that it is frequently used in ridicule or cliche terms. But in the case of 5G the only health and safety is testing for thermal heat on a plastic dummy. There is no human being involved in the industry's safety testing standards. There is no 'biological' testing on 5G frequencies. 

Now imagine if we were launching a new pharmaceutical drug on the market. How much testing would be required? Quite a lot.. 

Why is this glaring inconsistency allowed to prevail? 

That is why the group of scientists  - called the 5G Appeal—is asking the European Union to cease the development of the new network until independent studies, not funded by the mobile phone industry, can evaluate the impact of the technology on human health, and especially on infants and young children. The group had previously appealed to the United Nations and governments to encourage the World Health Organization (WHO) to "exert strong leadership in fostering the development of more protective EMF guidelines."

The scientists are especially worried about the 5G radiation because it is effective only across short distances, which means more masts will need to be installed—possibly one for every 12 houses in urban areas—that will "massively" increase exposure to Electro-magnetic Frequencies (EMFs).

This is a renewal of the campaign they originally launched in 2015. They have renewed their calls for a moratorium on the 5G network roll-out following the publication of a new report from the National Toxicology Program (NTP). NTP researchers discovered "statistically significant" increases in the rates of brain and heart cancers in animals exposed to EMF levels that are well below the current safe limits. They have also noted that EMFs are harming animal and plant life.

---